This is the same guy who retraction watch coveted for gathering OK Cupid data without permission — widely considered unethically. Do you want an ardent eugenicist on your side? There brilliant people on both sides, but google him a bit to see if you want to follow his lead.
-
-
Replying to @JamesKaufman @KirkegaardEmil
I know exactly who Emil is. I don't agree with everything that my Twitter followers say or do because that's how false consensus and confirmation bias happen. He is aware that I disagree with him, but that doesn't stop us from productive conversions.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I disagree with the idea of excluding anyone from scholarly discourse. Isolating people is a recipe for creating bubbles and allowing incorrect ideas to flourish. In a worst case scenario, it leads to conspiracy theories, oppression, and martyrdom status for fringe elements.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Russwarne @KirkegaardEmil
I should have rephrased. Anyone can engage in discourse. I believe in free speech. But there are also people who I do not believe are worth listening to. I, personally, have decided to not work with people with certain views I find immoral. This is only my choice, not my advice.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Collection of eg dating site data is hardly unethical and indeed commonplace in data science courses. Lots of people did okcupid before me to no furor. Just search github.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.