Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
KirkegaardEmil's profile
Emil O W Kirkegaard
Emil O W Kirkegaard
Emil O W Kirkegaard
@KirkegaardEmil

Tweets

Emil O W Kirkegaard

@KirkegaardEmil

#psychology #genomics #hbd #rstats #statistics #genomics #transhumanism #dataviz #openscience #psychometrics @OpenPsychJour

Denmark
emilkirkegaard.dk
Joined January 2012

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Socialist Climber‏ @thecandykeynes 8 May 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @joelwatsonfish

      So that implies that the US systemically depressed the IQ of african americans by denying them wealth and education and segregating them from the rest of scoeity and the ability to reproduce with other groups for the past 200 years?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. Socialist Climber‏ @thecandykeynes 8 May 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @thecandykeynes @joelwatsonfish

      because if high iq people reproducing with high iq people creates a new, higher "genetic mean" than obviously the inverse must also be true -- separating lower iq people from the general population would necessarily create a new, lower "genetic mean" among that population.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. Joel Fish‏ @joelwatsonfish 8 May 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @thecandykeynes

      Segregating the B/W populations in the U.S. would certainly affect the means to which traits regressed -- if the genetic means are different. I think in the U.S., selecting mates based on IQ is only a recent phenomenon (1 or 2 generations), outside very wealthy families.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    4. Socialist Climber‏ @thecandykeynes 8 May 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @joelwatsonfish

      These strike me as contradictory: (1) High % of AAs have Igbo ancestry and went through slavery, have avg(iq) ~85 (2) Self-selecting immigrants have high IQ and create a high-mean subgroup, having kids with IQ (3) IQ is strongly heritable and minimally impacted by environment

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Socialist Climber‏ @thecandykeynes 8 May 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @thecandykeynes @joelwatsonfish

      The mechanism you describe -- high IQ people reproducing with high IQ people to create a new subpopulation with a higher mean -- would take numerous generations to actually work. the first generation at least would be expected to regress towards the population mean.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Joel Fish‏ @joelwatsonfish 8 May 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @thecandykeynes

      Regarding (1), you have to look at genetic relatedness. Statistics like "have at least one ancestor from population X" aren't really useful here; especially if the one ancestor is like five or more generations back.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Joel Fish‏ @joelwatsonfish 8 May 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @joelwatsonfish

      And of course it should be obvious that modern self-selection of immigration on one hand, and the forced selection via slavery on the other hand are hardly comparable. And it's not that IQ is minimally impacted by environment; it's shared environment that has minimal affect.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. Socialist Climber‏ @thecandykeynes 8 May 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @joelwatsonfish

      Would it be fair to conclude that, regarding the B/W IQ gap, that if it was constructed by successive generations of forced selection, that we really can't expect that the one/two generations that have come into existence since Jim Crowe would see drastic improvements?

      4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Joel Fish‏ @joelwatsonfish 8 May 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @thecandykeynes

      There is too much to unpack here and too much that I don't know to agree to anything. Social outcomes are affected by all sorts of things, especially public/social policy. But that necessarily mean they completely responsible for differences in group outcomes.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Joel Fish‏ @joelwatsonfish 8 May 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @joelwatsonfish

      If you want a better understanding of the hereditarian perspective then following people like @JayMan471 @KirkegaardEmil @hbdchick and maybe @charlesmurray or @gcochran99 would be a good place to start. Im not sold on that perspective but Im not comfortable dismissing it either.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil 8 May 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @joelwatsonfish @JayMan471 and

      That guy ain't trying to understand anything. Mute and move on.

      10:36 AM - 8 May 2018
      • 4 Likes
      • Frog man vs. Bug man Joel Fish 🎃🕸👻 hbd chick👻🕸🎃 Francisco Boni
      0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info