The comparison to climate skeptics etc. is deliberate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doubt_Is_Their_Product … https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchants_of_Doubt …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. A data-driven Turkheimer journal article can be taken at face value, no questions asked. Not many people you can say that about.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You have done nothing to disprove his or Kevin Mitchell's theories on genetics. Shouldn't you be doing that in order to be taken seriously?
-
Agreed. All scientists should be judged on their science, not their extra-curricular remarks.
-
You are another psychologist who doesn't offer scientific explanations for something which one would suggest are very complex biological interactions
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.