Maybe the Guardian shall start inviting people who actually research the topic to wrote articles on race and intelligence? So far, a one-sided group of outsiders. https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2018/may/02/why-genetic-iq-differences-between-races-are-unlikely …
Less ideological than the previous Guardian pieces. There's no ideological content in this, just the author's misunderstanding of evolution of polygenic traits.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I mean: there is no writing about how bad this is for policy, how evil authors are etc. Mitchell sticks to the point, but gets it wrong. Much better than the others.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
is there an 'mansplaining' equivalent when a psychologist explains genetics to a neuroscientist?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.