So far, appears he has 1) abused editor role to massive self-cite, 2) massive self-cite in general, 3) extreme levels of self-plagiarism. I know some researchers have privately questioned validity of his data before, so worth a look with the tests you guys refined on Wansink.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.