@KirkegaardEmil has a small dataset where this can be tested, with genomic ancestry proportion estimates. The results are consistent with hereditarianism, but with wide confidence intervals and not many control variables.
Odd claim considering that we expected the findings to be similar to those previously reported, i.e. people who prefer economic freedom and social freedom are somewhat smarter, which we also found. Sample too small for p<.05 for one of these patterns.
-
-
You clearly showed in your paper that there is not that much overlap between people who supported social freedoms and the ones that support economic "freedom"(the brahmin left and the marchant right as Piketty would put it).
-
Your correlations are readily explain by the SES-IQ correlation and the progression of left political inclinations in the upper middle classes(Brahmin left vs merchant right, you should read Piketty's paper which document that trend).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A question, what is your opinion of Chanda Chisala vs HBDers debate ? Because your only post i read on the matter is supportive of Chisala's view.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.