Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
KirkegaardEmil's profile
Emil O W Kirkegaard
Emil O W Kirkegaard
Emil O W Kirkegaard
@KirkegaardEmil

Tweets

Emil O W Kirkegaard

@KirkegaardEmil

#psychology #sociology #hbd #rstats #statistics #genomics #transhumanism #dataviz #openscience #psychometrics @OpenPsychJour

United States
emilkirkegaard.dk
Joined January 2012

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Mar 19

    How much should you trust IQ etc. information from The Guardian? Experts answer: not so much http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=7113 pic.twitter.com/v1TpK0yAO7

    5:27 PM - 19 Mar 2018
    • 42 Retweets
    • 95 Likes
    • sebastian Oantastlig Mike LaTorra Gargle Blastr Solaris Rex M_Methuselah Baleia D gypsy Komrade J
    6 replies 42 retweets 95 likes
      1. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Mar 19

        Of course, @akarlin88 and @Steve_Sailer are happy. :)

        1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
        Show this thread
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. I Aver 🌲‏ @i_aver Mar 19
        Replying to @KirkegaardEmil

        That’s well deserved for @Steve_Sailer >> @washingtonpost, @TheEconomist, @nytimes. Any sociologists listed, @NickWolfinger?🤔pic.twitter.com/Kgp6Q2CHyE

        2 replies 11 retweets 17 likes
      3. Nicholas H Wolfinger‏ @NickWolfinger Mar 20
        Replying to @i_aver @KirkegaardEmil and

        I can make up unsourced rankings too!

        4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      4. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Mar 20
        Replying to @NickWolfinger @i_aver and

        These aren't unsourced?

        1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
      5. Nicholas H Wolfinger‏ @NickWolfinger Mar 20
        Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @i_aver and

        I meant the list of influential media sources that had Mr. Sailer at the top.

        2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
      6. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Mar 20
        Replying to @NickWolfinger @i_aver and

        What list of influential media sources? These rankings are based on ratings by IQ researchers.

        2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
      7. Nicholas H Wolfinger‏ @NickWolfinger Mar 20
        Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @i_aver and

        Aha. I was never informed of this.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      8. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Mar 20
        Replying to @NickWolfinger @i_aver and

        I guess you didn't read the link then.

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      9. Nicholas H Wolfinger‏ @NickWolfinger Mar 20
        Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @i_aver and

        Still confused. Didn’t see a link in the initial tweet. But that was so long ago in twitter time that I’m not sure of anything at this point.

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      10. 1 more reply
      1. New conversation
      2. DGo‏ @Go321D Mar 19
        Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @Steve_Sailer

        Why is Steve Sailer doing significantly better than Anatoly Karlin on here?

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      3. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Mar 19
        Replying to @Go321D @Steve_Sailer

        Why are you saying it is "significantly"? There's no error bars.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      4. DGo‏ @Go321D Mar 19
        Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @Steve_Sailer

        I meant that Sailer's score here is noticeably higher than Karlin's.

        2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Mar 19
        Replying to @Go321D @Steve_Sailer

        Yes, and I ask, indirectly, what makes you think this isn't just chance variation? There are no error bars.

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      6. DGo‏ @Go321D Mar 19
        Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @Steve_Sailer

        Oh, you mean there's the possibility that Steve Sailer might have simply gotten more lucky in regards to this by talking less about IQ than Anatoly Karlin has?

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      7. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Mar 19
        Replying to @Go321D @Steve_Sailer

        No. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margin_of_error …

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      8. DGo‏ @Go321D Mar 19
        Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @Steve_Sailer

        Oh; OK. So, basically, it's very similar to the margin of error which is used in pre-election polls, correct?

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      9. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Mar 19
        Replying to @Go321D @Steve_Sailer

        Statistical uncertainty, standard error, margin of error, etc. call it what you will. If you see a party go up 2% in a poll, do you offer explanations? No, you check whether it's likely just a random fluke first. Same with these data.

        1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
      10. 5 more replies
      1. New conversation
      2. Jimmy‏ @jimmyseventy Mar 19
        Replying to @KirkegaardEmil

        Hey Emil, I've seen some criticize Rinderman's 2013 survey as having too low a response rate, and that respondents were probably more hereditarian and non-representative of field. Have you written/blogged about this? If not, quick thoughts?

        2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      3. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Mar 19
        Replying to @jimmyseventy

        Citation needed? I haven't seen anything by anyone serious. Expert surveys almost always have low response rate, so that's a pretty generic criticism of many surveys.

        2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      4. Ronan‏ @ronanfitz22 Mar 20
        Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @jimmyseventy

        really? a generic criticism of surveys is that theyre methodologically flawed? interesting.

        2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Mar 20
        Replying to @ronanfitz22 @jimmyseventy

        Low response rate is normal for expert surveys. E.g. this one on climate science had 29%.https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es501998e …

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      6. Ronan‏ @ronanfitz22 Mar 20
        Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @jimmyseventy

        if you dont have a differential response rate, sure it might not matter. Where's the evidence that their sample was not biased ?(beyond expecting to take at face value their claim that 'lefties and righties' both refused equally?

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      7. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Mar 20
        Replying to @ronanfitz22 @jimmyseventy

        What's the evidence it is? zzz This is boring.

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      8. Ronan‏ @ronanfitz22 Mar 20
        Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @jimmyseventy

        The assumption should be it might be biased when you have a 10-18% response rate, when the survey youre replicating had 65%, and when people responded saying the questions werent good/doubt the experts you were canvassing, no?

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      9. End of conversation

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info