My analysis of Kevin MacDonald's pseudoscience:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12110-018-9310-x/fulltext.html …
-
-
In this list Jensen is #47 while Herrnstein doesn't even make it on the list.https://www.apa.org/monitor/julaug02/eminent.aspx …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Shockley was probably the most "prominent" proponent of hereditarianism if we're thinking just about general academic prestige (rather than contributions to knowledge).
-
In retrospect I probably should have put Shockley on the list. My first idea was to calculate the percentage of Jews among the signatories of the 1997 WSJ editorial, but I didn't think I could do it accurately. Some people get angry if you send an email asking if they're Jewish.
-
Counting Jews like that is problematic because you need to know their ancestry %s for a proper estimate, not just people with >0%. My % is 3 but it would be somewhat silly to count me as Jewish hereditarian. By the way, Rich Haier has a Jewish surname too.https://books.google.com/books?id=_dQP4nHgyVUC&pg=PA349&lpg=PA349&dq=%22haier%22+jewish&source=bl&ots=APyudOJ9AR&sig=duFcuxFw1jOxBHmr5-CGoptdBok&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjthtuIvfHZAhWNt1kKHeD6BNMQ6AEIOzAD#v=onepage&q=%22haier%22%20jewish&f=false …
-
MacDonald and I both define someone as Jewish (for the purpose of this discussion) if they're at least 1/2. You can rarely tell for sure that someone is Jewish just by their name. I would have had to contact all 52 signatories to ask, but I didn't think they would all answer me.
-
In the course of fact-checking for the paper, I emailed a sociologist (who was in a position to know) to confirm that Philip Hauser was Jewish. He emailed me back accusing me of being an anti-Semite wanting to obtain this information for "evil purposes."
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.