hi, I've heard of the first few but not TIVA - and it's a pretty ambiguous search term :). Would you mind sharing a link or quick description, I am just curious. thanks a lot!
Only the beginning of AI-assisted clean-up of the scientific literature. Soon AI will use GRIM, GRIMMER, SPRITE, TIVA etc. Some current 'heroes of science' will be found to be fraudsters. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/02/23/269415 …pic.twitter.com/O0rrQ676X1
-
-
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not a biologist- what’s the issue w reusing figures? Is the idea that this would detect ppl who publish the same study in difft journals? Isn’t that already a bit obvious for well-cited ppl? Seems like an interesting idea but don’t quite get the application.
-
the fraudulent use is if you take the picture from one treatment and then pretend that it shows another treatment. One pic may have label "Halo3 cells treated with aleph" and the recropped pic in another figure/paper might say "Halo4 cells treated with beta"
-
Ohhhhhhhhhh yes that’s very bad, ty for explanation.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Very likely this is just an issue w my lack of familiarity w these kinds of papers/research
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Those heroes will blame overzealous grad students. Still, a good development
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Time to invest in popcorn futures given the shitstorm statcheck caused https://www.nature.com/news/stat-checking-software-stirs-up-psychology-1.21049 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.