These data are for both sexes though. Seemingly, the IQ link is stronger for men.pic.twitter.com/zbB6MNbKDG
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That was my inclination.
#Dataclysm
Dataclysm was such a wasted opportunity. The full OKCupid dataset is amazng, but they haven't made much scientific use of it. See also our released paperhttps://openpsych.net/paper/46
-
-
Wasted opportunity for researchers you mean? The book was basically an expose of what we know are inconvenient truths. No?
-
Yes, that' what I meant. It's a great dataset that could tell us a lot about human mating, and how to improve it. Instead, it sits behind locked doors used for only a few analyses done by non-experts. What a pity!
-
No doubt. Perhaps b/c no 'gold-standard' measures of constructs 'experts' reluctant to make use of?
-
Experts can't access the data, except for the part I published in standard format. There's a few exceptions where others also used the data e.g. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10691898.2015.11889737 … andhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4533555/ …
-
I see. So it is *not* publicly accessible? Or only the part yo published in standard format? I imagine you need someone on board to develop a 'scraper' as well?
-
Most academics are not capable of scraping a dating site, so while the data is public, it's not in a suitable format (read: SPSS friendly).
-
What % of academics in social sciences you think know how to use SAS/Mplus/R? .csv .txt
-
Programming knowledge is growing, but most profs are old and don't know anything other than point and click, or some limited syntax. Maybe 10% of social scientists know proper coding now, but it is rising with the youngsters. http://r4stats.com/articles/popularity/ …pic.twitter.com/Pk4Czk9TRi
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.