Haven't read the paper but the effect sizes reported in the abstract are pretty small. How do they match up to previous findings re differences between boys/girls? As in, is it enough to cascade upward to generate noticeable differences that can be recognized as stereotypes?
-
-
-
They are quite small, yes. Presumably due to the reporting format.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
All your stereotypes are belong to us.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.