Or finishing a study at a certain level (in the fiture), which is what the Edutwitter is mostly about? Problem is still the a-theoretical nature of the IQ-test. There may be a test-outcome correlation (=prediction), but no proof of something real (such as 'g').
Which part of it? If you read my miscegenation blogpost, you will see that I considered the genetic explanation unlikely. If you read the Jewish blogpost, you will see that I was being critical of MacDonald-type conspiracy theories and proposed an empirical test.
-
-
Can people please watch this and then tell me it's nothing to worry about.https://youtu.be/nT4GMu_bFOE
-
Watched the first 5 and last 5 minutes. Now I’m going to find out how to turn the internet off.
-
We must face up and see what these people are saying. This is connected to government. Please steel yourself and watch it.
-
I am just numbed.
-
I keep saying - these are not little nobodies with no audience that we can ignore - they are close to govt advisors. -
Watched the whole thing. It was like two undergrads who don't study biology or psychology talking about psychology and biology in the pub. How are people taken in by this stuff? I hope
@DavidDidau wasn't. -
Ironic that they were discussing IQ.

- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ugh. So now it comes down that we're engaging with someone who justifies paedophilia and has extremely dubious views on eugenics, race, IQ (understatement) Block. Some people should have a very long look in the mirror that this is happening
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.