That article there doesn't seem to support your argument. And it doesn't change the fact that it's only hacks like Charles Murray that support those fraudulent arguments. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/the-real-problem-with-charles-murray-and-the-bell-curve/ …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Unsourced graphs obviously prove something.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
If you ever been to academia you would know better than posting a 20-year old article.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The article on Emil Kirkegaard even has sources, bloody hell.pic.twitter.com/p2FwN8E2ug
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @Weaty2 @WingTransparent and
Yeah, the work of dedicated stalker Oliver Smith. He's so annoying that lots of people created pages on him years before I was so unlucky to be targeted. https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Oliver_D._Smith
10:19 PM - 8 Jan 2018
2 replies
0 retweets
1 like
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.