Thread. You can't make this. Ellemers, 2018, Annual Review of Psych, Gender Stereotypes, spent two single spaced pages discussiong whether gender stereotypes have a "kernel of truth" w/o citing A SINGLE 1 of the>15 studies on the accuracy of gender stereotypes.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @aeronlaffere @KirkegaardEmil
Hope that helps. Here are some sources that predate Ellemeres (2018) that show this has been going on for a LONG time. Last is a live interview -- you can listen to it while doing chores: 1. http://ow.ly/E59430hCPKK 2. http://ow.ly/bYBH30hCPLr 3.http://ow.ly/rgsx30hCPMK
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I was wondering, to what extent can/has the lens be turned upon itself? I mean, how much peer reviewed research has been done regarding quantitatively measuring explicit biases in, say, peer reviewed social psychology research?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Funny you should ask. I have some tweets automated, usually on other stuff that I think is either good or at least interesting. oThis one is scheduled to go out later, but since you asked... STATUS biases seem to be most powerful peer review biases. http://ow.ly/95cv30hARNq
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Personal case where blinding might have had an effect. Though this would need to blind the editors too. http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=7018
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Interesting. You mentioned this once, but I had forgotten about it. I am pretty sure RU's IRB is quite clear that consent, permission, debriefing IS NOT required for public records. I won't say "I don't get it," but the ethics concerns seemed to have barked up wrong tree.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
A bunch of other people scraped this website before and some released the data too. Scraping websites like this is commonly thought in data science courses. I was unlucky that a prominent SJW (Oliver Keys) happened to see my case, and the mediastorm started.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.