Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?
    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
KirkegaardEmil's profile
Emil O W Kirkegaard
Emil O W Kirkegaard
Emil O W Kirkegaard
@KirkegaardEmil

Tweets

Emil O W Kirkegaard

@KirkegaardEmil

#psychology #genomics #hbd #rstats #statistics #genomics #transhumanism #dataviz #openscience #psychometrics @OpenPsychJour

Denmark
emilkirkegaard.dk
Joined January 2012

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list

    Under 100 characters, optional
    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Philippe Lemoine‏ @phl43 1 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @KirkegaardEmil

      The one I can't seem to find precise figures for is pretty old anyway (2001).

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil 1 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @phl43

      We are including all >2000 data, but if we already have >0 sample for the country, it has less priority.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. Philippe Lemoine‏ @phl43 1 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @KirkegaardEmil

      Yeah, I remember, and I'll try to find it. What I meant is that it's less of a problem if I can't than if I hadn't been able to find the details of the 2012 poll.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil 1 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @phl43

      Sometimes I had to rely on media reported second-hand results. These typically leave out smaller parties, or details regarding % non-voters. But it is better to include what one can find than having no data.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Philippe Lemoine‏ @phl43 1 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @KirkegaardEmil

      Okay, I'm not sure but I *think* I can find the results for the major party in that 2001 poll.

      3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Philippe Lemoine‏ @phl43 1 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @phl43 @KirkegaardEmil

      Done.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil 1 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @phl43

      Nice. I did the standardization on the 2002 data. The 2012 first round data seems to be slightly off. Sums to 101.5. Only for journos.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. Philippe Lemoine‏ @phl43 1 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @KirkegaardEmil

      Yeah it's because there were 3 candidates for whom the poll only said "< 0.5%" and I had put them at 0.5 without thinking about this issue. I put them at 0 now, which should deal with this problem.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil 1 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @phl43

      Actually this causes the ratios to be infinite, so filling in the low numbers is better.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Philippe Lemoine‏ @phl43 1 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @KirkegaardEmil

      Okay I'll set them to 0.25 then.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil 1 Dec 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @phl43

      Have a look at the calculations sheet, scroll down to the bottom to my adjustment for 2002 data. Correct as desired.

      3:48 PM - 1 Dec 2017
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. Philippe Lemoine‏ @phl43 1 Dec 2017
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @KirkegaardEmil

          Okay I had apparently inverted the score for journalist and the population in the case of one party, which is why it didn't sum to 100 for the election actual results. I corrected it in the calculation sheet.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info