@phl43 official reminder for you to add some French data. We are missing both France and Switzerland, but we have Belgium.https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1X9g7Eh-EerrkjtabHazNu-a-niVC4t5dObok_aNUP0g/edit#gid=2060900662 …
Show this thread
-
Yeah, I remember, and I'll try to find it. What I meant is that it's less of a problem if I can't than if I hadn't been able to find the details of the 2012 poll.
Sometimes I had to rely on media reported second-hand results. These typically leave out smaller parties, or details regarding % non-voters. But it is better to include what one can find than having no data.
-
-
Okay, I'm not sure but I *think* I can find the results for the major party in that 2001 poll.
-
Done.
-
Nice. I did the standardization on the 2002 data. The 2012 first round data seems to be slightly off. Sums to 101.5. Only for journos.
-
Yeah it's because there were 3 candidates for whom the poll only said "< 0.5%" and I had put them at 0.5 without thinking about this issue. I put them at 0 now, which should deal with this problem.
-
Actually this causes the ratios to be infinite, so filling in the low numbers is better.
-
Okay I'll set them to 0.25 then.
-
Have a look at the calculations sheet, scroll down to the bottom to my adjustment for 2002 data. Correct as desired.
-
Okay I had apparently inverted the score for journalist and the population in the case of one party, which is why it didn't sum to 100 for the election actual results. I corrected it in the calculation sheet.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.