@phl43 official reminder for you to add some French data. We are missing both France and Switzerland, but we have Belgium.https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1X9g7Eh-EerrkjtabHazNu-a-niVC4t5dObok_aNUP0g/edit#gid=2060900662 …
Show this thread
-
I was going to do it last time but didn't have the rights to write in the document, then you gave them to me but I forgot. Sadly, I think there are only 2 legitimate polls, and precise figures for one of them seem hard to come by. I'll do this tonight.
Good! :) I was able to find some German (hence readable to me) Swiss data, so just need France. A single poll is sufficient, but multiple is better. (We average within country results before analysis to avoid double counting.)
-
-
The one I can't seem to find precise figures for is pretty old anyway (2001).
-
We are including all >2000 data, but if we already have >0 sample for the country, it has less priority.
-
Yeah, I remember, and I'll try to find it. What I meant is that it's less of a problem if I can't than if I hadn't been able to find the details of the 2012 poll.
-
Sometimes I had to rely on media reported second-hand results. These typically leave out smaller parties, or details regarding % non-voters. But it is better to include what one can find than having no data.
-
Okay, I'm not sure but I *think* I can find the results for the major party in that 2001 poll.
-
Done.
-
Nice. I did the standardization on the 2002 data. The 2012 first round data seems to be slightly off. Sums to 101.5. Only for journos.
-
Yeah it's because there were 3 candidates for whom the poll only said "< 0.5%" and I had put them at 0.5 without thinking about this issue. I put them at 0 now, which should deal with this problem.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.