What was the rejected paper about?
-
-
-
Something naughty.
-
Genomic ancestry and outcomes, in this case.
-
Racy stuff no doubt
-
With the incorrect spin on the results too. Maybe I need to write completely dishonest articles, but still get the empirical results out. "The results indicated that Trump is evil, that socialism is good and race is an illusion invented by Evil Whitey" (Then show the usual plots)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is this your PING study?
-
Ya. John likes to submit it to various places to see the bias. Well, another one for the list.
-
But you're not submitting to multiple journals at the same time, are you?
-
Sequentially I think.
-
Wow. Good luck. I hope you're really patient (and simultaneous submission IS unethical).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe he's not so great to you (25% Jewish). ;)
-
Tweet unavailable
-
You describe yourself as "Warrior on JQ", so obviously I assume you that you somewhat an extremist on that question. Such persons are known to be hostile to Jewish accomplishment. Jensen was a staunch individualist, which is a bad fit for ethno-nationalism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
wtf? How creepy & Orwellian is that?!
-
Wrong-think must be punished...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.