Switzerland does relatively well, but it still takes in a bunch of refugees (and fakers) etc.
Of course, the more obvious solution is: don't take in net negative persons. Much simpler than trying to work out how to reduce net negative impact of said persons after taking them in.https://twitter.com/JohnHolbein1/status/936031396438728704 …
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
"net negative persons"? You'll be suggesting gene testing to determine this next.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"turn for the worse" in what way? Lose their job or something?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that's exactly what Sweden did 1984. The unions forced the govt to stop work migration=ban on refugees to work. It lead to migrants having less than 50% workforce participation bc of welfare dependence. Hence Sweden's problems today.
@johnholbein1 -
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
the article is about refugees BTW
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so people should have the added worry that if they lost their job they might also be deported?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.