The effect of most immigration in Western countries is obviously a very stark negative (as every study with obvious metrics shows). If one can somehow cook a dataset to find the opposite pattern, it really just shows that economic modeling is very flexible indeed.
-
-
I read a study from a major university about how mass immigration is good because of diversity. But they specified it didn't account for race, ethnicity or gender. Very odd.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Though in studies like the one I mentioned (and various recommended) they seem to make the distinction between 3rd world countries and 1st world countries. The former benefiting more. Would you think this study shows flexible modeling?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe it can even be viewed as a measurement of how valid such analyses are in general. Like the way studies of ESP can be seen as a form of measurement of the validity of all psychology experiments.
-
Yes, the control group. Economic modeling in general is quite unreliable. Too flexible for the amount and type of data they have. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecoj.12461/abstract …pic.twitter.com/qBnEFgLyWe
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.