Has anyone seen an FOI on @TeachFirst budget recently ?If getting £ for research, that needs to be reviewed if they engage in science denial
-
just keep practicing the tests ;)
-
-
then why do they use IQ tests centrally in their resesrch?
-
a) necessary condition for showing you raised intelligence b) they don't know or want to do the latent variable analysis
-
oh it's b) that got me - why do you psychologists always assume that you are speaking to another psychologyst
-
the statistical analyses to show increases in general intelligence instead of just IQ are complicated and require lots of subjects and tests
-
The easiest method that doesn't require a lot of fancy stats is examining far transfer gains. E.g. WM training -> vocab gains.
-
Evidence does not support far transfer claims, however. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691616635612 …pic.twitter.com/TDtC7hjH1a
-
Agreed on no transfer to g, but as I've argued no far transfer is not evidence for the immutability of intelligence http://www.johnprotzko.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Protzko-2016.-Cog-training-and-the-structure-of-g.pdf …pic.twitter.com/qlmNR3gqPY
-
With all these heretical views, you will soon have to join the outcasts in the IQ fringe! Better watch out! ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed, but we have rasied g. http://www.johnprotzko.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Protkzo-2016.-raising-IQ-raising-g-and-fadeout.pdf … I've got another paper coming down the pipeline showing another study raised g too.
-
It's a good study. What does the MCV plot look like? Why wasn't it included?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.