It has less to do with sample size, than multiple lines of, plain old, common sense. If IQ does such a good job at predicting,why do we have Noble laureates with mere 120ish IQs (10th percentile). So In every class of 20, I've ever been in, there is one Feynman undiscovered. Ha.
Ken Richardson has the same citation habits as Richard Nisbett. Arguing a highly implausible negative based on n=30. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.110.9895&rep=rep1&type=pdf …pic.twitter.com/Dxlj5IzCCY
-
-
-
Muted. Also, learn to use Twitter (thread replies).
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Unfortunately, nearly all authors merely offer uncritical citations of the primary sources in support of their statements (for exceptions see, for example, Wagner, 1994, and in the following sections). Instead of scrutiny of the true nature of the evidence, a conviction.......
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
... regarding a “large and compelling literature” seems to have developed from a relatively small number of meta-analyses over a cumulative trail of secondary citations (Furnham, 2008, p. 204).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.