I actually don't know as much about Lynn as I should. @KirkegaardEmil is probably a good authority on that.
-
-
I think you should focus less on authors and more on the data. Read the books. There is no substitute to hard work.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @Omar04618473
Have you read the criticism? It specifically mentions the data selection is at least partially dodgy. And author matters in this case.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This is not some random niche scientific paper, this is a highly politicized issue, so any bias is relevant.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DieterFrikadell @Omar04618473
Of course I have read the criticism. I have also read the rebuttals and I'm closely familiar with the underlying data.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
One cannot find the truth by trying to second guess author motivations. One must look at the data. No substitute to hard work.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @DieterFrikadell @Omar04618473
You need to do more research on the topic before trying to debate online. Read some stats, IQ textbooks, then read the reviews on race & IQ.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @Omar04618473
You should have read slower. I point out why I consider any debate on this between laymen mostly pointless at this point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Logically following I wasn't even displaying any interest in being dragged imto a debate down this particular foxhole.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It is pointless for laymen, just as every other complex scientific issue. However, decisions must be made in real life, so one has to try.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.