And it goes beyond simple theft.
If you really don't think that this data was snagged by Kushner (investor in @howaboutwe, btw)...
Show this thread
-
Determined stalkers will stalk. It will only get worse as facial recognize software becomes ubiquitous. No more anonymity in the crowd.
Annoying stalkers should be dealt with by legal means if necessary. It seems that in your case, these were insufficient.
-
-
For the data availability to his accounts and IP addresses, it was sufficient.
-
Removing my data from the context of the site and allowing bulk download of said data was not permitted by the TOS.
-
When I later moved, he would still have been unable to access any updated info, so I continued to use service.
-
Your actions bypassed security mechanisms put in place by the courts, which, at the time, banned him from using all sites I contributed to.
-
But they didn't explictly ban him from downloading data from 3rd party sites which violated the TOS of the sites I used.
-
They explicitly stated something along the lines of that being a concern for the site with which I had an agreement, via TOS/EULA.
-
And your breach of the TOS facilitated a violation of the restraining order in breach of CA PC Section 502. http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/502.html …
-
And as I created said data in the state of California, THOSE are the legal means by which I have to deal with this issue.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
"Annoying stalkers"?! The man TRIED TO KILL HER!! There could be countless others whose lives were harmed because you exposed their info.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.