Designers build affordances into sites to protect users from harm. Removing data from that ecosystem obviates those protections.
-
-
Annoying stalkers should be dealt with by legal means if necessary. It seems that in your case, these were insufficient.
-
For the data availability to his accounts and IP addresses, it was sufficient.
-
Removing my data from the context of the site and allowing bulk download of said data was not permitted by the TOS.
-
When I later moved, he would still have been unable to access any updated info, so I continued to use service.
-
Your actions bypassed security mechanisms put in place by the courts, which, at the time, banned him from using all sites I contributed to.
-
But they didn't explictly ban him from downloading data from 3rd party sites which violated the TOS of the sites I used.
-
They explicitly stated something along the lines of that being a concern for the site with which I had an agreement, via TOS/EULA.
-
And your breach of the TOS facilitated a violation of the restraining order in breach of CA PC Section 502. http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/502.html …
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.