in violation of a user's contract with the original service provider. Lawsuits don't cut it.
Show this thread
Your anecdote doesn't really show anything. He could have easily saved a copy of the profile beforehand himself. Don't be silly.
-
-
Determined stalkers will stalk. It will only get worse as facial recognize software becomes ubiquitous. No more anonymity in the crowd.
-
Annoying stalkers should be dealt with by legal means if necessary. It seems that in your case, these were insufficient.
-
For the data availability to his accounts and IP addresses, it was sufficient.
-
Removing my data from the context of the site and allowing bulk download of said data was not permitted by the TOS.
-
When I later moved, he would still have been unable to access any updated info, so I continued to use service.
-
Your actions bypassed security mechanisms put in place by the courts, which, at the time, banned him from using all sites I contributed to.
-
But they didn't explictly ban him from downloading data from 3rd party sites which violated the TOS of the sites I used.
-
They explicitly stated something along the lines of that being a concern for the site with which I had an agreement, via TOS/EULA.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.