The problem with eugenics is not the science, it's the compulsion (including de facto compulsion by poverty).https://twitter.com/KirkegaardEmil/status/908137774913638405 …
I agree. I oppose coercive eugenics. (I don't know what de facto compulsion thru poverty refers to.)
-
-
One example would be welfare only for people who take part. There are many other possible financial coercions with less impact on the rich.
-
There's a whole continuum of such policies. I don't think one can just rule them all out immediately. Calling them coercive is slippery.
-
Well. Even the mildest coercion can be slippery too. I agree, however, that, as with many laws, a continuum has to be made binary somewhere.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.