Of course, these reactions to Murray are wrong. But I love to tell you more: U.S.: https://www.povertyactionlab.org/evaluation/discrimination-job-market-united-states …. Germany: http://ftp.iza.org/dp4741.pdf
-
-
-
Yes, statistical discrimination is a thing. Irrational not to do it too.
-
I do not agree. 1) People's beliefs, on which they base discrimination, are not always correct (stereotypes). 2) Causes problems/segregation
-
Stereotypes are generally accurate and people generally follow them rationally (Bayes theorem). I don't see segregation as a problem.
-
It's really quite simple. Treat people as individuals to the extent it is possible. When you don't have the relevant info, assume group mean
-
Delay insuffic info judgment of individual if not need immed decision. Using "group mean" already characterizes by a group feature. Groupism
-
Sure, but it is usually necessary to make decisions based on limited info (e.g. dating), in which case rational to use group mean/mode.
-
Anonymity in INet age produces "limited info". Not desirable for optimum human interactions. http://selfsip.org/focus/anonymity.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.