What predicts self-reported discrimination? Not perceived race or skin tone, but IQ does. Add Health follow-up study http://rpubs.com/EmilOWK/add_health_discrimination …pic.twitter.com/NrrFJHuoji
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
@fsnole1 Which way does causality run? Are dumber ppl more discriminated against, thus leading to more self reported discrimination?
I.e. that ppl of lower IQ perhaps confirm negative stereotypes, and this results in worse treatment?
It seems reasonable to explore IQ*race interaction, to this end.
A reasonable counter-proposal. Results, however, are not very sensible.pic.twitter.com/shRuKbXdON
The beta for IQ is somewhat stronger here, but p>a due the model having too little free variation to estimate precisely (large SEs).
Ok, fair. But Im not sure this settles the question of direction of causality. That will perhaps require an additional study.
It could be done using an experimental setup where subjects are given ambivalent info and asked whether they were discriminated against.
Prediction here being that the less bright will be more likely to ascribe it to discrimination holding the ambiguity constant.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.