-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe the difference is caused by muscles not skeleton? Also, TIL the plural of "pelvis" is "pelves", which I can't wait for a chance to use
-
Yes, muscles and other factors too. But no effect of pelvis width despite extreme evolutionary cost? Very low prior!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This seems to be talking about the mechanical efficiency of the joint so wouldn't be contradicted by top speed performance.
-
Two cars could be equally efficient but with one more powerful than the other.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I prefer to leave things up. Suppose a new, definite study is done, I will either look very good or very bad. I'll take my chances.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, I don't think it is accounting for differences in actual runnerspic.twitter.com/BnMzetEF6y
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Men and women are equal in every way. Don't be a bigot. Also, redefine the world around this fairytale.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The variable was efficiency, not speed, so your criticism isn't valid unless you cite studies that show efficiency as different.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How? How are these ideologues so dismissive of obvious observable facts, and the science that backs them up. It's ENRAGING!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But the model ensures men and women have equal outcome. So it's a correct model.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.