Another big surprise. Not at all predictable. All groups equally likely (but some are more likelier than others).pic.twitter.com/E9qzH16KGg
-
Based on? What is publically known? Is that data reliable? Biased?
There are studies of terrorism rates, yes. Two in OP, but also elsewhere: https://openpsych.net/paper/9 https://openpsych.net/paper/52
-
-
Based on successful attacks? Attempts? I will read but the idea that what is public is accurate is unrealistic.
-
Stereotype accuracy is a thing. Muslims have quite more positive ideas about terrorism than other groups. Polls: https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/opinion-polls.aspx#terror …
-
So, we have all kinds of data, all pointing in the same direction, and known media and researcher bias in the other direction.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I will read more but Y(Islamist attacks)=a+% Muslims+[...]+error is disingenuous at best wrt yr statement. That is some weak sauce.
-
Statistical association, lots of terrorist groups, opinion surveys, etc. all in the same direction. Why think otherwise? Makes little sense.
-
1/2 Yr initial statement vague - which grps? opinions aren't evidence FWIW. Equally, detection focus on type A!=most prevalent grp.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.