Could smaller sex diffs in traits also be the result of sex-linked genes being target of stronger sexual selection on males (lower SD)?pic.twitter.com/6aQIssIUKA
Women and computer science: a no-brainer http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=6882
-
-
-
Possibly increased selection for sexual dimorphism in the more northern groups. Animal studies would be informative here perhaps.
-
If we are talking about personality related trait variation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513815001075 …pic.twitter.com/On3Ef3k66H
-
Various lines of evidence of selection for personality. However, hard to estimate past selection effects and whether they differ by group.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
regarding the declining of % you mentioned in the end. There was a big campaign in the US with exactly this goal.
-
I can try to find the article regarding this again, if you are interested
-
Not particularly interested, minor side-interest. But do forward it to
@slatestarcodex and whoever else cares more. -
I see, anyway, it was related to what was mentioned in http://gender.stanford.edu/news/2011/researcher-reveals-how-%E2%80%9Ccomputer-geeks%E2%80%9D-replaced-%E2%80%9Ccomputergirls%E2%80%9D …
New conversation -
-
-
btw. I have the feeling your article is more about the current state, not about the reasons.
-
And it assumes the first 10y of life are not relevant for the conclusions to draw out of it.
-
I believe to have seen studies showing, that the first years already have a strong effect on what you did analyse
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.