Obviously, I'm very happy that prog. is fairly meritocratic, because that's the only way an odd person like me can thrive. :)
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Scott doesn't consider that companies already put a lot of thought into how to desire who to hire. His suggestions won't work equally well.
-
Tons of modern companies use very questionable personality tests/assessments for hiring. Fashionable but not very effective.
-
Or maybe they're effective for the price. One should always be skeptical in thinking all companies are leaving free value on the table.
-
They r not effective for the price bc they don't work & cost a fortune. Your prior in the rationality of market+companies is far too strong.
-
Its basically just not thinking I know better than vast amount of smart people whose job it is to be smart about these things.
-
You probably do know better than the vast amounts of smart social psychologists out there, do you not? ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This has been my view for years. There's not just one anti-meritocracy book--there are many. It's hard to find any pro-meritocracy writing.
-
The very first book that used the word "meritocracy" was by a socialist who was arguing for the abolition of selection exams in education.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.