Free trade: yay or not? (Review of Free Trade Doesn't Work: What Should Replace It and Why) http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=6832
-
Fletcher's essay about the history of protectionism in the U.S. was eye-opening:http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/713521
My skepticism towards non-empirical economics is ~100%, but it's also high for historical cases/reviews. Easy to cherry-pick.
-
-
For some examples of this kind of fake history, seehttps://humanvarieties.org/2017/03/21/inquiries-into-fake-history-antoine-duchesne-1766-and-georg-forster-1786-on-race-in-context-to-natural-history/ …
-
I don't see the connection. The history of US trade seems more clear cut. There's a record of tariffs and statements about them.
-
Point is not about US history, but arguing from case studies of history to infer that protectionism is or is not bad.
-
That wasn't the main point of the essay, as I saw it. The main point was that it was widely thought of as good by US elites b4 mid-20th C.
-
That, in and of itself, doesn't mean it's a good policy now, but Fletcher's point there was that many today are ignorant of the history.
-
And he's right about that. I recall an op/ed column in the
@FT last year criticizing Trump that asked what Lincoln would think of his views. -
The writer assumed that because Lincoln is a revered Republican, and Republican elites today believe X, Lincoln did too.
-
I don't care in particular about US history because I'm not American.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Did you read that essay?
-
Essay is in the book.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.