your google-fu is weak today? http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1996-01401-008 …
So, any direct replications of the famous peer pressure line lengths study? Study from 1951, 4900 citations. I can't even find a pdf!!pic.twitter.com/IohBUrrEGF
-
-
-
I did say direct replications. :) (And I didn't search at all, I just noticed the suspicious context about the original study.)
-
You should just be happy I sent you that rationality study from ISIR2015! :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I swear to god if the Asch study also fails to consistently replicate I'm going out and burning every copy of every social psych text I own
-
N = 80ish. Citation to sample size ratio is a good measure of how skeptical you should be. (also add in age somehow)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
small n, but replication in Japanese population w/o Confederates. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22044061
-
Good find. Needs larger n, but otherwise great setup.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Effects seem strong, but write-up is terrible so hard to tell. Needs a direct replication w open data for reanalysis.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Your library doesn't have a print copy?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.