ping @AmirSariaslan for interest
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You shouldn't use that term. These terms are based on a calculation method no longer used. Use the more descriptive term, latent correlation
-
That's what the methods assume they are: unobserved (latent) Pearson correlations obstructed by poor measurement. :) http://john-uebersax.com/stat/tetra.htm
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Doesn't surprise me. There's probably assortative mating on most human traits. But it's nice to have the data.
-
Very little AM for self-rated personality traits, at least OCEAN variety. Odd results. Measurement problem?
-
I don't know much about personality research. But personality test scores almost always show lower correls w/criteria, compared to IQ.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
As the Finns say (sarcastically): svenskatalande battre folk.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.