I'm very grateful for @fsnole1's reposting of this--he's gracious even in defeat.
https://twitter.com/fsnole1/status/872106659228909569 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Damn close that's for sure!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BenWinegard @HitchMagee
Honestly, it's just cool to see civil disagreement. I was thinking about a piece "the importance of being wrong" on how scholars should 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BenWinegard @HitchMagee
Embrace their errors and constantly revise positions like good Bayesians would instead of digging in and always doubling down
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BenWinegard @HitchMagee
Think you should convince them to make public, quantified, definite predictions first, so they can see that they are wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @HitchMagee
I agree. I'd also love to see betting markets on certain topics so I could see divergence between bets and publicly held views
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenWinegard @HitchMagee
It has been done, but limited extent. http://www.pnas.org/content/112/50/15343.full …
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @HitchMagee
Interesting! I'd like to see more of this, especially on controversial topics
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'll ask Nisbett etc. to predict the outcomes of my next genomic ancestry paper before doing the analysis.
-
-
-
I know where I'm putting my money.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.