![🎃[_____]🌑[_____]👺](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/828940040436748288/_py_Xs_m_normal.jpg)
Some people just answer questions at random, at least sometimes, so we should never expect 100% even if 100% knows.
USA: Republicans are more scientifically literate than Democrats (depends on item sampling perhaps) http://anepigone.blogspot.dk/2017/05/bill-nye-cant-deny-republicans-are-more.html …pic.twitter.com/cvPdgIGh2i
-
-
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Slightly more advanced analysis on the GSS data. 2.65%point adv to Reps overall http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=6761
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Minor error. The scoring like this is not good, and it's possible (but unlikely) that a proper analysis would find D's score to be higher.
-
This is because your analysis is a crude count, and one must look at the item properties to score persons, and then aggregate to groups.
-
Unfortunately, I don't have time right now to conduct such an analysis. I guess I will just write a post summarizing the problems.
-
Slightly more advanced analysis on the GSS data. 2.65%point adv to Reps overall http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=6761
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
Those percentages are insane.
-
New conversation -
-
-
"The greenhouse effect is caused by a hole in the earth's atmosphere." This is an incorrect statement, right?
-
Yes. It's mixing up the Ozon layer (holes in it due to CFC etc.) and Greenhouse problems. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
In OKCupid data, this one is >90%, so seems that OKC is somewhat selected.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.