@HoustonEuler For your reply to Turkheimer et al. see https://openpsych.net/paper/10 which is the followup on that HV post.
-
I updated the post on Turkheimer, adding the scatterplots. http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=6271 One has to be naive to accept that finding as it is.
-
-
Re. Rindermann survey. They apparently left out the BW question of their paper, but you can see it in their slides. http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/2013-survey-of-expert-opinion-on-intelligence.pdf …
-
Btw, Drob is the husband of Harden, so obviously she knew about his meta-analysis. Even worse not to cite it. Seems very dishonest.
-
I can't stand dishonesty. THAT is what motivates me to do these studies: First large genomic study. More coming. https://osf.io/z8dy5/ pic.twitter.com/3GpumnDK8e
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.