Depends what you consider small. If you adjust for measurement error, r will be around 0.3 in this huge convenience sample.
-
-
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @katiecorker and
Depends on the issue. I find .34 for the NCDS but IQ is measured in childhood and openness at age 50>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dingding_peng @KirkegaardEmil and
.20 in the GSOEP, but with obviously crappy measure of intelligence (MWT-A) & only four items openness>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dingding_peng @KirkegaardEmil and
NLSY .06, but measure doesn't capture the "intellectual" side of openness. Corrs not corrected for measurement error.>
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dingding_peng @katiecorker and
Okcupid data is another huge convenience sample with nonstandard & suboptimal IQ measurement. Did not examine the link in it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @katiecorker and
for this question, I'd say representative sample>>convenience sample because of endogenous selection bias, cfhttp://www.the100.ci/2017/03/14/that-one-weird-third-variable-problem-nobody-ever-mentions-conditioning-on-a-collider/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dingding_peng @KirkegaardEmil and
Yes! Way better... Key take-away for me is that O/I & IQ are (moderately) correlated but distinct. This is not universally acknowledged.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DMCpersonality @KirkegaardEmil and
It isn't? Do people believe that it's the same? Or that it's uncorrelated?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dingding_peng @KirkegaardEmil and
Many claim (or want to believe) IQ subsumed by the 5th factor. Could be in theory but not measured that way w common assessment models.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DMCpersonality @KirkegaardEmil and
I like it how you and Emil stated exactly the opposite answer ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Maybe not so common knowledge then!
Maybe IQ researchers say what I wrote, personality researchers say what he wrote.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.