Maybe @DMCpersonality just knows the answer :) David - what's the correlation between g and O/I in SAPA? Feel free to ignore if burdensome!
-
-
Replying to @katiecorker @polisisti and
They are here https://sapa-project.org/dmc/docs/CondonISSID2015FINAL.pdf … .16 and .20. Not sure if corrected for measurement error.pic.twitter.com/3mZJsQujIE
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @katiecorker and
Based on IQ ~~ parental edu. of only .14, I take it without correcting for measurement error.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @polisisti and
Soooo fair to say small then? :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @katiecorker @polisisti and
Depends what you consider small. If you adjust for measurement error, r will be around 0.3 in this huge convenience sample.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @katiecorker and
Depends on the issue. I find .34 for the NCDS but IQ is measured in childhood and openness at age 50>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dingding_peng @KirkegaardEmil and
.20 in the GSOEP, but with obviously crappy measure of intelligence (MWT-A) & only four items openness>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dingding_peng @KirkegaardEmil and
NLSY .06, but measure doesn't capture the "intellectual" side of openness. Corrs not corrected for measurement error.>
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dingding_peng @KirkegaardEmil and
so I'd guess .30 is not a bad guess, but this will depend on measure. For example, in the NCDS, can split in two subdimensions>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dingding_peng @KirkegaardEmil and
>imaginative one has r = .18; intellectual one .41 (and this is with ~40 year lag and without disattenuation).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I guess we almost have a new meta analysis to write up! 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.