I would've suspected corr to be < .30. Wonder what modern meta-analysis would show.
-
Soooo fair to say small then? :)
Depends what you consider small. If you adjust for measurement error, r will be around 0.3 in this huge convenience sample.
-
-
Depends on the issue. I find .34 for the NCDS but IQ is measured in childhood and openness at age 50>
-
.20 in the GSOEP, but with obviously crappy measure of intelligence (MWT-A) & only four items openness>
-
NLSY .06, but measure doesn't capture the "intellectual" side of openness. Corrs not corrected for measurement error.>
-
Okcupid data is another huge convenience sample with nonstandard & suboptimal IQ measurement. Did not examine the link in it.
-
for this question, I'd say representative sample>>convenience sample because of endogenous selection bias, cfhttp://www.the100.ci/2017/03/14/that-one-weird-third-variable-problem-nobody-ever-mentions-conditioning-on-a-collider/ …
-
Yes! Way better... Key take-away for me is that O/I & IQ are (moderately) correlated but distinct. This is not universally acknowledged.
-
It isn't? Do people believe that it's the same? Or that it's uncorrelated?
-
It's long been 'common knowledge' that personality and g are unrelated. Not quite true, and possibly very wrong if we use other rating data.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.