The reply to his claims is herehttp://humanvarieties.org/2013/04/03/is-psychometric-g-a-myth/ …
-
6/ I'm not saying that modern g isn't a useful predictor of all sorts of things.
It would appear that the g requirement for using chained tweets is quite high.
-
-
Just as a starter, so that a polymath can get the math right: http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may/VIGRE/VIGRE2007/REUPapers/FINALAPP/Khim.pdf …
-
Schönemannian sophistry does not work on me.
-
Are you saying that you disagree with the blog post you linked to & think that psychometric studies do tell us about neurobio of cognition?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And I tagged the wrong shalizi in a tweet! Yet
@MorHeene & I could understand simple blog posts – curious!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People who understand that Tweet numbers are unordered should also understand the implication of eigenvalues sorted by size (Perron-F.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.