Do you think it is useful to think of research findings or effects to be "true" or "false"?
-
This may sound a little over-dramatic, but imo this way of thinking is counterproductive as well as misleading. Will blog about it later.
If you mean dichotomous thinking → all kinds of problems (NHST etc.), then Gelman writes about it at length.
-
-
The dichotomy isn't even the main issue, although it certainly is problematic, imo. I'm more troubled by it ignoring knowledge & evidence.
-
Our believes can be true - the world just is. So we should to think about to what extent we can know something is or isn't. Model knowledge.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.