@KirkegaardEmil Hey, my understanding so far was that IQ was a bullshit benchmark to measure human intelligence.
-
-
No, I mean stuff like "intelligence".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This probably arises from my misconception of what's exactly measured. I'll read the books and come to a conclusion.
-
You measure a behaviour, on the basis of which inferences about cog ability may occur.
-
'Intelligence' is an aggregate index of cog ability across a number of cog domains (ideally: researchers are often very lax here).
-
That is, cognition/intelligence is never directly measured. It's inferred.
-
My worry is, are we at a fruitful point in history to deduce the independent variables? My cursory look revealed no as an answer.
-
I really have to explore this further to understand the methodology. Do you have any good start points?
-
Now you switching from measurement to causality. There's a lot of stuff on causality, most of it impenetrable mathy stuff.
-
This modularity and decoupling is one of the fundamental drawbacks of the quantification team I was told :D http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/616815.The_Modularity_of_Mind …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.