no,I will have to ask you to think politically.If it worked like that the env.side would be screaming that finding at the top of their lungs
-
it found smaller effect and only in the US, but since article is in US that bit is not relevant.Bates seemed to interpet that as'replicated'
Overall consistent with 0, known publication bias. Then you try to use a subsample result? Do you see how this is not a good idea?
-
-
meta claimed no publication bias, last I know from your blog describes it as 'unsatisfactory maybe', have you done any further analysis?
-
There's always publication bias, and Turkheimer's original study has all the obvious signs.
-
Just look. You're telling me to trust this? Second is US studies only. Methinks you should be more skeptical.pic.twitter.com/g0WGztPwtF
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.