no,I will have to ask you to think politically.If it worked like that the env.side would be screaming that finding at the top of their lungs
-
like, mentioning race specifically http://humanvarieties.org/2014/03/24/about-that-gene-environment-interaction-study-by-turkheimer-et-al/ … (this was before the meta confirming effect exists but more modest etc.)
Meta-analysis did not confirm it exists by conventional standards. Please read numbers, not author spin.
-
-
it found smaller effect and only in the US, but since article is in US that bit is not relevant.Bates seemed to interpet that as'replicated'
-
Overall consistent with 0, known publication bias. Then you try to use a subsample result? Do you see how this is not a good idea?
-
meta claimed no publication bias, last I know from your blog describes it as 'unsatisfactory maybe', have you done any further analysis?
-
There's always publication bias, and Turkheimer's original study has all the obvious signs.
-
Just look. You're telling me to trust this? Second is US studies only. Methinks you should be more skeptical.pic.twitter.com/g0WGztPwtF
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.