When people attack me for not publishing in mainstream 'top tier' journals, I always think of these findings. http://bjoern.brembs.net/2016/01/even-without-retractions-top-journals-publish-the-least-reliable-science/ …pic.twitter.com/YMOxb5D9L0
-
>People using Excel for papers >In the current year.
You would be surprised... And then we have evidence showing that errors in spreadsheets are disturbingly common. http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.3457
-
-
Lulz. I thought people would have learned after the Rogoff-Reinhart affaire. It is surprising because using a proper script makes things
-
Clearer, reproducible, and reduces probability of error. The only reason not to do it is because one doesn't want to learn how to write code
-
And that's a bad attitude from an academic. Surely if one has the brains to understand the concept of significance testing, one can code.
-
Top IQ researchers can't code either, and they endlessly talk about the generalness of general intelligence! THE IRONY IS NOT LOST ON ME.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.