So, someone did a follow-up attack. This one bothered to look at my site and compile some evidence.https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/633ufb/by_the_ignorant_for_the_ignorant_what_is_a/ …
-
-
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
"Intelligence, a low-impact journal" xDD He is doing what I describe in my blog as 'express rejection of evidence', which can be rational
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArtirKel @KirkegaardEmil
From his point of view(bayesian la) , given what he knows about you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArtirKel
Yes, his 6 classical indicators are very indicative of crackpot, and yet it is not true in this case (I hope). But one cannot know without
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @ArtirKel
reading stuff on the topic. One must be a topic expert to be able to make firm judgments. E.g. consider similar case https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Lee_Whorf …
5:00 AM - 3 Apr 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.