So, someone did a follow-up attack. This one bothered to look at my site and compile some evidence.https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/633ufb/by_the_ignorant_for_the_ignorant_what_is_a/ …
-
From his point of view(bayesian la) , given what he knows about you.
Yes, his 6 classical indicators are very indicative of crackpot, and yet it is not true in this case (I hope). But one cannot know without
-
-
reading stuff on the topic. One must be a topic expert to be able to make firm judgments. E.g. consider similar case https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Lee_Whorf …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.